|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anthropocentrism (from Greek: άνθρωπος, anthropos, "human being"; and κέντρον, kentron, "center") is the belief that humans must be considered at the center of, and above any other aspect of, reality.1 This concept is sometimes known as Humanocentrism.
EnvironmentalismAnthropocentrism has been posited by some environmentalists, in such books as Confessions of an Eco-Warrior by Dave Foreman and Green Rage by Christopher Manes, as the underlying if unstated reason why humanity dominates and sees the need to "develop" most of the Earth. Anthropocentrism has been identified by these writers and others as a root cause of the ecological crisis, human overpopulation, and extinctions of many non-human species. Anthropocentrism, or human-centredness, is believed by some to be the central problematic concept in environmental philosophy, where it is used to draw attention to a systematic bias in traditional Western attitudes to the non-human world 2. Val Plumwood has argued34 that anthropocentrism plays an analogous role in green theory to androcentrism in feminist theory and ethnocentrism in anti-racist theory. Plumwood calls human-centredness "anthrocentrism" to emphasise this parallel. Defenders of anthropocentrist views point out that maintenance of a healthy, sustainable environment is necessary for human well-being as opposed for its own sake. The problem with a "shallow" viewpoint is not that it is human centered but that according to William Grey5 "What's wrong with shallow views is not their concern about the well-being of humans, but that they do not really consider enough in what that well-being consists. According to this view, we need to develop an enriched, fortified anthropocentric notion of human interest to replace the dominant short-term, sectional and self-regarding conception." One of the first extended philosophical essays addressing environmental ethics, John Passmore's Man's Responsibility for Nature6 has been repeatedly criticised by defenders of deep ecology because of its anthropocentrism, often claimed to be constitutive of traditional Western moral thought.7 ChristianitySome evangelical Christians have also been critical, viewing a human-centered worldview, rather than a Christ-centered or God-centered worldview, as a core societal problem. According to this viewpoint, humanity placing its own desires ahead of the teachings of the Bible leads to rampant selfishness and behavior viewed as sinful. The use of the word "dominion" in Genesis, where God purportedly gives man dominion over all creatures is controversial. Somecitation needed consider this to be a flawed translation of a word meaning "stewardship", but it persists as the most common translation. In the 1985 CBC series "A Planet For the Taking", Dr. David Suzuki explored the Old Testament roots of anthropocentrism and how it shaped how we view non-human animals. In his book Pale Blue Dot, author Dr. Carl Sagan also reflects on what he perceives to be the conceitedness and pettiness of anthropocentrism, specifically associating the doctrine with religious belief.8 BiocentrismBiocentrism has been proposed as an antonym of anthropocentrism. In fictionIn science-fiction, Humanocentrism is the idea that humans, as both beings and a species, are the superior sentients. Essentially the galactic equivalent of white supremacy, it discriminates against sentient non-humans, much as white supremacists discriminate against non-whites. This idea is countered by Anti-humanism. Such an ideology echoes a potential (but not certain) future for Neo-Nazism. References
See also |
| All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog. |